RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02310 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His grade of Master Sergeant (MSgt, E-7) be reinstated. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He honorably served in the Air Force for over 24 years and at the end of his career he made some bad life choices. The reduction in grade was too severe of a punishment and he was used as an example. In 2009, he relapsed and drank alcohol one night. He did not report the relapse to Mental Health (MH) and as a result he was dropped from the outpatient program. He realizes he is an alcoholic. His commander and first sergeant told him that if he retired quietly there would be no more punishment. He reluctantly submitted his retirement papers. On 19 Nov 09, he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for being over the legal limit. He dropped into a pattern of drinking and received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) for not coming into work. He did not tell anyone about his depression, anxiety and suffering. On 6 Jan 10, he was driving when he dropped his cell phone. He bent down to grab the phone and drifted across the road and slid into a parked car. Although he blew a .076 which was under the legal limit, he was arrested and taken to jail for Driving Under the Influence (DUI). He was within days of his retirement. He was not offered an Article 15 but was offered an administrative demotion. He was told that his retirement date would be extended and he would be court-martialed if he did not accept the reduction in grade. After 24 years, he was being coerced to take a punishment. A reduction in grade was not appropriate for the off base DUI. It was too harsh for an under the legal limit DUI. The Board should consider it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application as the punishment did not fit the crime. He worked very hard to achieve the rank of MSgt, to include writing the Specialty Knowledge Test (SKT) for his career field. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant entered the Regular Air Force on 3 Jun 85. On 11 Feb 10, he was notified by his commander of her intent to recommend that he be administratively demoted to the grade of Technical Sergeant (TSgt, E-6) In Accordance With (IAW) AFI 36- 2503, Administrative Demotion of Airmen, paragraph 3.3 “Failure to fulfill NCO responsibilities. The specific reasons for the recommendation include an arrest on 14 Nov 09 for DUI with a Breath Alcohol (BrAC) sample of .129. Further, he failed to notify his chain of command. On 6 Jan 10, he was again arrested for DUI with BrAC sample of .076. According to an undated memorandum, the 3rd Wing Judge Advocate (3 WG/JA) found the recommendation for the administrative demotion legally sufficient. According to a memorandum from the 3rd Medical Squadron Commander (3 MDSS/CC) dated 17 Feb 10, the applicant was notified the demotion authority demoted him to the rank of TSgt with an effective date of 16 Feb 10 based on his failure to fulfill NCO/SNCO responsibilities. On 17 Feb 10, the applicant acknowledged the demotion and indicated he did not intend to apply for retirement in lieu of demotion. On 28 Feb 10, he was retired in the grade of TSgt and was credited with 24 years, 8 months and 28 days of active service. On 19 Jul 13, the Secretary of the Air Force determined the applicant served satisfactorily in the higher grade of MSgt within the meaning of 10 U.S.C. § 8964 and directs his advancement to the grade on the retired list effective the date of completion of all required service. Per 10 U.S.C. § 8964, each retired member who is retired with less than 30 years of active service is entitled to, when his active service plus his service on the retired list totals 30 years to be advanced on the retired list to the highest grade in which he served on active duty satisfactorily. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial. The commander acted within his authority to demote the applicant to the grade of TSgt IAW AFI 36-2503, Administrative Demotion of Airmen. The demotion action taken against the applicant was procedurally correct and there is no evidence there were any irregularities or that the case was mishandled in any way. A legal review was conducted by the 3 WG/JA and they found the file legally sufficient as the actions taken were permissible administrative actions taken at the discretion of the applicant’s supervisors/commanders. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02310 in Executive Session on 26 Feb 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014- 02310 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Jun 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOE, 9 Jul 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Sep 14.